About 316,000 results
Open links in new tab
  1. Intuitions of competent speakers may vary from one scenario to another. They may not consider a retraction mandatory in a private con-versation, but may do so in a public setting.

  2. The main narrative that emerged from the interviews is that the retraction of their papers is perceived by the authors as a means of censoring and silencing critical voices in the field of...

  3. cademic journals have fallen prey to false research. Research retraction has plagued over 82% of the Web of Science (WoS) disciplinary categories (Grieneisen & Zhang, 2012), and the …

  4. characteristics of retraction notices. It is possible that retraction is perceived to be stigmatizing but actually not communicated as such in retraction notices or that it appears less ...

  5. The retraction of a previously published research article, often due to the discovery of fraud or scientific error, can pose considerable threat to an author’s career and reputation.

  6. ct is important to explore: the variable associated with the highest increase in retraction is the victim being injured (+186%). Experiencing previous domestic violence incidents from the...

  7. What might this say about the users of such evidence? Over the past decade, retraction, an esoteric feature of the scholarly publishing system, has come increasingly into the spotlight.

  8. Hence, the alleged retraction of Rizal on the 29th of December 1896 raises two big questions to us: did he really retract? If he did, why?

  9. Abstract: On April 6, 2017, Retraction Watch, which is now widely regarded as a self-proclaimed ethical entity that specializes in research fraud and retractions, and whose deeply anti-science...

  10. Uti-lizing bibliometric methods and drawing on data from sources such as Web of Science, Retraction Watch, and PubMed, many studies have delved into the fundamental patterns of …